Open Access

MyD88-dependent and independent pathways of Toll-Like Receptors are engaged in biological activity of Triptolide in ligand-stimulated macrophages

  • Vummidigiridhar Premkumar1,
  • Moul Dey2Email author,
  • Ruth Dorn3 and
  • Ilya Raskin3
Contributed equally
BMC Chemical Biology201010:3

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6769-10-3

Received: 18 November 2009

Accepted: 12 April 2010

Published: 12 April 2010

Abstract

Background

Triptolide is a diterpene triepoxide from the Chinese medicinal plant Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F., with known anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and anti-cancer properties.

Results

Here we report the expression profile of immune signaling genes modulated by triptolide in LPS induced mouse macrophages. In an array study triptolide treatment modulated expression of 22.5% of one hundred and ninety five immune signaling genes that included Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs elicit immune responses through their coupling with intracellular adaptor molecules, MyD88 and TRIF. Although it is known that triptolide inhibits NFκB activation and other signaling pathways downstream of TLRs, involvement of TLR cascade in triptolide activity was not reported. In this study, we show that triptolide suppresses expression of proinflammatory downstream effectors induced specifically by different TLR agonists. Also, the suppressive effect of triptolide on TLR-induced NFκB activation was observed when either MyD88 or TRIF was knocked out, confirming that both MyD88 and TRIF mediated NFκB activation may be inhibited by triptolide. Within the TLR cascade triptolide downregulates TLR4 and TRIF proteins.

Conclusions

This study reveals involvement of TLR signaling in triptolide activity and further increases understanding of how triptolide activity may downregulate NFκB activation during inflammatory conditions.

Background

Chronic inflammation is an important patho-physiological condition impacting various diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atherosclerosis, diabetes, and cancer. Recent evidence suggests the involvement of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in various chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [13]. TLRs belong to the family of pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition receptors and are vital components of the host's immune system for sensing dangerous pathogens, and for initiating inflammatory and immune responses directed against these pathogens. The mechanism of signal transduction through TLRs is well characterized [411]. There are two possible routes for mediation of signals received by TLRs depending on which of the two adapter molecules (MyD88 and TRIF) are involved. The importance of MyD88 and TRIF lies in the finding that each leads to a distinct profile of immune mediators that in turn determine the phenotype of the cells that are primarily responsible for the development of adaptive immune responses [14]. TLR4 mediates through both the MyD88 and TRIF pathways, TLR3 signals through TRIF and all the other TLRs mediate through MyD88 pathway [58]. Characterization of cellular responses to various ligands that selectively activate specific TLRs is not only useful in better understanding of disease pathogenesis but can also potentially help identify molecular targets by which pharmacological compounds modulate TLR-mediated signaling pathways and target gene expression.

Triptolide is a biologically active diterpene triepoxide from a Chinese herb Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, commonly known as thunder god vine. Extracts from this plant have been historically used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat inflammatory and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus, psoriatic arthritis and Behcet's disease [12]. Triptolide inhibited the expression of proinflammatory markers including COX-2 and iNOS in RAW macrophage [13]. Triptolide suppressed c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation, COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in microglial cultures treated with lipopolysaccharide [14]. NFκB activation due to inflammatory response in chronic diseases is well characterized [15]. Existing reports demonstrate the effect of triptolide on NFκB activation and target gene expression as well as its effect on other transcription factors [16]. Although TLRs are known to impact downstream NFκB activation [17], effects of triptolide in TLR signaling have not been evaluated. In this study we investigated the effects of triptolide activity on receptors and target gene expression induced by activation of TLRs.

Methods

Chemicals and biochemicals

Antibiotics, Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), triptolide (MW 360.4) and LPS (lipopolysaccharide from E.coli, serotype 055:B5) were purchased from Sigma chemicals (St. Louis, MO). Ligands for TLR2 (Zymosan) and TLR3 (Poly I:C) were purchased from Invivogen (San Diego, CA). Cell culture media were obtained from Invitrogen Inc. (Carlsbad, CA). Reagents used in quantitative PCR, including enzymes MyD88 and TRIF pre-designed siRNA purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX). RAW 264.7 cell line (ATCC TIB-71) was provided by American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The BCA Protein Assay kit and NE-PER Extraction kit were obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL). The ECL Advanced Western blotting detection Kit chemiluminescence system from Amersham Biosciences (Buckinghamshire, UK). Broad ranger blotting markers, anti-TLR4 rabbit polyclonal antibody, anti-actin rabbit polyclonal antibody and Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-TRIF rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA)

Macrophage cell culture assay

RAW 264.7 macrophage cells were cultured as described by Dey et al., 2006 [18]. Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 0.4 × 106cells per well (viable cell counts were carried out by trypan blue staining using a hemocytometer) in 24-well plates 12 h prior to treatment. The cells were then treated with triptolide dissolved in DMSO at concentration (per ml of cells) of 20 ng, 10 ng, 5 ng and 1 ng for 2 h before elicitation with bacterial endotoxin LPS (lipo-polysaccharide from E.coli, serotype 055:B5) at 1 μg/ml for TLR-4 elicitation, Zymosan at 1 ug/ml for TLR-2 elicitation and Poly I:C (synthetic analog of dsRNA) at 10 ug/ml for TLR-3 elicitation. The corresponding molar concentrations of triptolide (MW 360.4) that are used in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 55.5 nM, 27.7 nM, 13.8 nM and 2.7 nM respectively. For each experiment, one positive control (cells treated with ligands and vehicle) and one negative control (cells treated with vehicle only) were included. For RNA extraction, the cells were harvested in TRIzol after 6 h of ligand stimulation and for protein expression the cells were harvested after 12 h. Two replicates were made for all the treatments and their controls. The concentrations of triptolide used were previously tested to be non-cytotoxic using a MTT assay [13]. The CC50 (concentration at which 50% of cells remain viable) of triptolide for macrophages is ~83.2 nM.

MyD88KO and TRIFKO using RNAi

Pre-designed small interfering RNA (siRNA) oligonucleotides targeting endogenous MyD88 and TRIF were purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX). The siRNA duplexes were transfected using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) into RAW 264.7 cells following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, cells were plated at 0.2 × 106 cell/well in a 24-well plate maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, cells were treated with 1 μl of 50 μM MyD88-siRNA or TRIF-siRNA in a transfection mixture containing lipofectamine 2000 and incubated in 5% CO2, at 37°C. After 24 h of transfection the medium was changed with 1 ml of fresh DMEM. Two hours before elicitation with LPS (1 μg/mL), the cells were treated with predetermined doses of triptolide. For RNA extraction, the cells were harvested in TRIzol after 6 h of treatment and for protein expression the cells were harvested after 12 h.

Total RNA extraction, purification, and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA extraction, purification and cDNA synthesis were performed following procedures described in Dey et al., 2006 [18].

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and gene array

qRT-PCR was performed as described by Dey et al., 2006 [18]. Gene-specific primers (synthesized by IDT Inc., Coralville, IA) used in the current study are described in Table 1. For the gene array experiment, PCR-arrays (APM_025, SABiosciences, MD) were purchased and the manufacturer's protocol was followed. Relative quantification based on SYBR green was used for individual and gene array experiments.
Table 1

Sequence of primers used for real time RT-PCR.

Gene symbol* (accession#)

Forward primer

Reverse primer

β-actin (NM_007393)

5'AACCGTGAAAAGATGACCCAGAT3'

5'CACAGCCTGGATGGCTACGT3'

COX-2 (NM_011198)

5'TGGTGCCTGGTCTGATGATG3'

5'GTGGTAACCGCTCAGGTGTTG3'

iNOS (XM_147149)

5'CCCTCCTGATCTTGTGTTGGA3'

5'TCAACCCGAGCTCCTGGAA3'

MyD88 (NM_010851)

5'TGGCCTTGTTAGACCGTGA3'

5'AAGTATTTCTGGCAGTCCTCCTC3'

TRIF (NM_174989)

5'TGGCAAACACCTTCAAGACA3'

5'GCGCTTTCTTCCAGCGTA3'

CCL3 (NM_011337)

5'TGCCCTTGCTGTTCTTCTCT3'

5'GTGGAATCTTCCGGCTGTAG3'

IRG1 (NM_008392)

5'GCTTTTGTTAATGGTGTTGCTG3'

5'GGCTTCCGATAGAGCTGTGA3'

TLR2 (NM_011905)

5'GGGGCTTCACTTCTCTGCTT3'

5'AGCATCCTCTGAGATTTGACG3'

TLR3 (NM_126166)

5'GATACAGGGATTGCACCCATA3'

5'TCCCCCAAAGGAGTACATTAGA3'

TLR4 (NM_021297)

5'GGACTCTGATCATGGCACTG3'

5'CTGATCCATGCATTGGTAGGT3'

*Refer to abbreviation list for full gene names

Immunoblotting analysis of TRIF and TLR4

The cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Equal amounts of total cellular protein (20 μg) was quantified using BCA protein assay kit according to the kit's protocol. The samples were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (100 V, 2 h) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (50 V, 2 h) in a buffer consisting of 20% v/v methanol, 200 mM Glycine, 25 mM Tris, pH 8.3. The membrane was blocked for overnight at 4°C and then incubated with anti-TRIF rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000) or anti-TLR4 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000) or anti-actin rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:5000) for 2 h at RT. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody was used and incubated for 1 h at RT. Immunodetection was performed using an ECL Advanced Western blotting detection Kit chemiluminescence system. The autoradiograms were quantified using scanning densitometry (Total Labs software v 2.01).

Cell fractionation and transactivation of NFκB (p65)

Nuclear extracts were prepared according to the instructions provided in NE-PER™ Pierce Nuclear and Cytoplasmic extraction kit). Cells were collected 45 minutes after LPS induction (1 μg/ml). A 50 μg amount of nuclear extracts from macrophage cells were electrophoresed in 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blocked with 5% Non-fat milk powder in PBS. Membranes were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to p65 (1/500) or anti-actin. Secondary anti-rabbit peroxidase bound antibody was used. The immunodetection was performed using an ECL Advanced western blotting detection Kit chemiluminescence system. The autoradiograms were quantified using scanning densitometry (Total Labs software v 2.01).

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). Statistical significance for the data for mRNA and densitometric analysis were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the group means were compared by the least significant difference test (LSD). The results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

Results

Gene array data confirmed known and revealed unknown genes affected by triptolide

Expression of one hundred and ninety five target genes in response to triptolide treatment were studied by gene array in LPS stimulated mouse macrophages. The genes based on their response to LPS stimulation were characterized as LPS-responsive (Table 2) and LPS-nonresponsive genes (Table 3). Among LPS-responsive genes, 42 genes were downregulated (Table 2a) and 2 genes (Table 2b) were upregulated by triptolide treatment. Fourteen genes were found to be non-responsive to LPS induction (Table 3). Of these non-responsive genes, 8 genes were downregulated (Table 3a) and 6 genes were upregulated by triptolide treatment (Table 3b). Huang et al. (2006) reported that 320 genes were upregulated in RAW 264.7 cells in response to LPS treatment but only 32 (10%) genes were downregulated by triptolide [19]. In our study that included some overlapping genes with Huang et al (2006) [19], triptolide down regulated 21% of the LPS-induced genes and affected a total of 22.5% of LPS-responsive genes (including down and upregulations) in RAW macrophages. Triptolide treatment was found to downregulate the expression of TLRs 1 and 4 (Table 2a), TLRs 3 and 7 (Table 3a), TNF, IL-6, IL-1, NFκB1, MAPK, Rel, Bcl3, COX-2 (Table 2a) and other important inflammation regulating genes (Tables 2, 3, 4). The gene array results obtained for COX-2, TNFα, IL1β (data not shown) and TLR4 were further validated using qRT-PCR. We further investigated expression of TLR-mediated genes to understand in greater details the extent of involvement of TLR signaling cascade in the activity of triptolide.
Table 2

Fold changes in gene expression in cells treated with triptolide (55.5 nM)+LPS (1 μg/ml) as compared to those treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) alone.

a) Downregulation of LPS- stimulated genes by triptolide.

Gene

Accession No.

Gene name

Fold change in response to treatment

Symbol

  

LPS*

LPS+triptolide

Ccl2

NM_011333

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2

19.90

-11.98

Ccl22

NM_011331

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 12

692.18

-8.53

Ccl3

NM_011337

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3

4.48

-3.82

Ccl5

NM_013653

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5

22.86

-19.05

Ccl7

NM_013654

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7

96.67

-19.73

Ccl9

NM_011338

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9

77.98

-30.74

Cxcl10

NM_021274

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10

113.38

-39.18

Cxcl11

NM_019494

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 11

41.50

-13.01

Il10

NM_010548

Interleukin 10

55.52

-47.24

Il10ra

NM_008348

Interleukin 10 receptor, alpha

4.01

-3.21

Il13ra1

NM_133990

Interleukin 13 receptor, alpha 1

13.13

-11.17

Il18

NM_008360

Interleukin 18

17.33

-7.68

Il1a

NM_010554

Interleukin 1 alpha

2360.70

-102.68

Il1b

NM_008361

Interleukin 1 beta

1140.14

-55.02

Il1f6

NM_019450

Interleukin 1 family, member 6

51.09

-39.18

Il2rg

NM_013563

Interleukin 2 receptor, gamma chain

15.73

-5.66

Itgam

NM_008401

Integrin alpha M

7.09

-5.91

Itgb2

NM_008404

Integrin beta 2

3.82

-4.63

Spp1

NM_009263

Secreted phosphoprotein 1

5.60

-3.25

Tgfb1

NM_011577

Transforming growth factor, beta 1

4.27

-1161.68

Tnf

NM_013693

Tumor necrosis factor

58.69

-45.32

Tnfrsf1b

NM_011610

Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1b

90.82

-16.94

Bcl3

NM_033601

B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 3

20.51

-20.30

Crebbp

NM_001025432

CREB binding protein

2.92

-4.33

Csf2

NM_009969

Colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage)

116.81

-61.53

Csf3

NM_009971

Colony stimulating factor 3 (granulocyte)

13568.7

-355.41

Gja1

NM_010288

Gap junction membrane channel protein alpha 1

4.65

-6.20

Il6

NM_031168

Interleukin 6

674.65

-256.59

Nfkb1

NM_008689

Nuclear factor of kappa light chain gene enhancer in B-cells 1, p105

32.63

-3.37

Nfkbia

NM_010907

Nuclear factor of kappa light chain gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha

18.87

-2.93

Rel

NM_009044

Reticuloendotheliosis oncogene

114.40

-14.86

Ripk1

NM_009068

Receptor (TNFRSF)-interacting serine-threonine kinase 1

3.18

-7.80

Tlr1

NM_030682

Toll-like receptor 1

43.35

-18.55

Tlr4

NM_021297

Toll-like receptor 4

3.27

-5.40

Tnfaip3

NM_009397

Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3

56.41

-5.15

Cd14

NM_009841

CD14 antigen

4.01

-7.56

Cd86

NM_019388

CD86 antigen

4.24

-2.90

Ifnb1

NM_010510

Interferon beta 1, fibroblast

5.56

-7.15

Irf3

NM_016849

Interferon regulatory factor 3

3.02

-58.79

Ly86

NM_010745

Lymphocyte antigen 86

5.15

-8.21

Mapk8

NM_016700

Mitogen activated protein kinase 8

5.68

-11.06

Ptgs2

NM_011198

Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2

566.13

-51.89

b) Upregulation of LPS down regulated genes by triptolide.

Gene symbol

Accession No.

Gene Name

Fold change in response to treatment

   

LPS*

LPS+triptolide

Smad3

NM_016769

MAD homolog 3 (Drosophila)

-13.20

4.02

Mapk8ip3

NM_013931

Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 interacting protein 3

-5.19

4.21

* Fold changes for LPS treatments were determined by comparing to base level expressions in untreated cells

Positive values (≥+3) indicate stimulation while negative values (≤-3) represent suppression of gene expression.

Table 3

Fold changes in gene expression in cells treated with triptolide (55.5 nM) as compared to endogenous expression levels in untreated cells.

a) Downregulation (≤-3) of LPS-non responsive genes by triptolide.

Gene symbol

Accession No.

Gene Name

Fold change in response to triptolide

Bcl6

NM_009744

B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 6

-5.36

Cxcr3

NM_009910

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 3

-7.63

Tnfrsf1a

NM_011609

Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1a

-5.18

Eif2ak2

NM_011163

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 2

-4.51

Tlr3

NM_126166

Toll-like receptor 3

-10.73

Tlr7

NM_133211

Toll-like receptor 7

-12.85

Ly96

NM_016923

Lymphocyte antigen 96

-4.28

Map2k4

NM_009157

Mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 4

-3.01

b) Upregulation (≥+3) of LPS-non responsive genes by triptolide.

Gene symbol

Accession No.

Gene Name

Fold change in response to triptolide

Ccl25

NM_009138

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 25

6.05

Fasl

NM_010177

Fas ligand (TNF superfamily, member 6)

115.09

Irf1

NM_008390

Interferon regulatory factor 1

7.60

Mapk3

NM_011952

Mitogen activated protein kinase 3

5.84

Tnfsf14

NM_019418

Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 14

17.71

Traf3

NM_011632

Tnf receptor-associated factor 3

3.38

LPS (1 μg/ml) did not have any effect on these genes.

Table 4

Fold changes in gene expression in cells treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) as compared to endogenous expression levels in untreated cells.

Gene symbol

Accession No.

Gene name

Fold change in response to LPS

C3

NM_009778

Complement component 3

3.02

Il15

NM_008357

Interleukin 15

6.39

Ltb

NM_008518

Lymphotoxin B

4.48

Atf1

NM_007497

Activating transcription factor 1

4.43

Bcl10

NM_009740

B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 10

22.13

Cflar

NM_009805

CASP8 and FADD-like apoptosis regulator

14.01

Edg2

NM_010336

Endothelial differentiation, lysophosphatidic acid G-protein-coupled receptor, 2

6.49

Relb

NM_009046

Avian reticuloendotheliosis viral (v-rel) oncogene related B

21.38

Stat1

NM_009283

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1

5.89

Cd40

NM_011611

Cluster of Differentiation 40

112.83

Nr2c2

NM_011630

Nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group C, member 2

-4.07

Peli1

NM_030015

Pellino 1

5.48

Triptolide (55.5 nM) did not have any effect on these genes.

Effect of triptolide on downstream effector expression induced by TLR ligands

There are three possible routes through which TLR signaling is mediated [58]. These routes either involve the adapter molecule MyD88, TRIF or both. TLR3 signals through TRIF and all other TLRs mediate through MyD88 pathway whereas TLR4 utilizes both MyD88 and TRIF to transduce the signal it receives [58]. One of the important readouts of TLR ligand induction is a robust pro-inflammatory response such as an upregulated expression/secretion of chemokines and cytokines. Using this modulation of chemokines/cytokine expression during different ligand induction the response to triptolide treatment was evaluated. Triptolide inhibited the expression of COX-2 and iNOS induced by MyD88- specific ligand - Zymosan (TLR2), TRIF- specific ligand, Poly I:C (TLR3) and LPS (TLR4) which activates both MyD88 and TRIF pathways (Figure 1). Downregulation of COX-2 and iNOS by triptolide [13] along with selected cytokines/chemokines that are specific to each route of TLR signaling have been used to validate downstream effects of triptolide along the TLR pathway. COX-2 and iNOS expression is common to both MyD88-dependent and -independent (TRIF) signaling pathways. The expression of CCL3 is specific for MyD88-dependent pathway and expression of IRG-1 is a specific readout of the TRIF-dependent pathway [2022]. Triptolide inhibited the expression of CCL3 in macrophage induced with Zymosan (MyD88 specific ligand) and LPS (TLR4 specific but utilizes both TRIF and MyD88) (Figure 1A and Figure 1C). Triptolide also inhibited the expression of IRG-1 in macrophages induced with Poly I:C (TRIF specific ligand) and LPS (Figure 1B and Figure 1C). These results demonstrate that triptolide inhibits the activation of chemokines involved in both MyD88 and TRIF dependent pathways.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6769-10-3/MediaObjects/12897_2009_Article_29_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Effect of triptolide on gene expression of COX-2, iNOS and chemokines in response to various TLR ligand activation in RAW macrophages. The effect of triptolide treatment (three replicates) on a specific gene expression was measured by the mRNA quantity relative to the response to ligand activation only (positive control) that was normalized to a value of 1.00; lower values represent greater inhibitory effects with 0.00 corresponding to a complete inhibition of the induced gene expression. The value of the negative control (no induction) was normalized to 0.00. Values are mean ± S.D. *, p < 0.05; (post-ANOVA comparison with Ligand-treated positive control). A. Effect of triptolide on mRNA levels of COX-2, iNOS and CCL3 following zymosan stimulation. B. Effect of triptolide on mRNA levels of COX-2, iNOS, and IRG-1 following Poly I:C stimulation. C. Effect of triptolide on mRNA levels of COX-2, iNOS, CCL3 and IRG-1 following LPS stimulation.

Effect of triptolide on MyD88KO and TRIFKO in RAW cells induced with LPS

To further validate the effect of triptolide on inflammatory pathways of MyD88 and TRIF, we evaluated the effect of triptolide on LPS induced macrophage under the two following scenarios: (1) MyD88 mediated pathway in the absence of TRIF regulation and (2) TRIF mediated pathway in the absence of MyD88 regulation. As both MyD88 and TRIF signaling pathways lead to NFκB activation [8], we determined the activity of triptolide on NFκB translocation to the nucleus (Figure 2). Also, because COX-2 and iNOS are downstream target genes regulated by NFκB, their increased expression is an indirect indicator of NFκB activation. To further validate results of Figure 1, whether or not triptolide modulates both MyD88 and TRIF mediated signaling pathways, the activation of NFκB and the expression of COX-2 and iNOS induced by LPS in MYD88-KO macrophages and TRIF-KO macrophages were determined. Triptolide suppressed LPS-induced NFκB translocation in a dose dependent manner as determined by immunoblotting of the p65 protein in nuclear extracts. We observed that the incubation of MyD88-KO and TRIF-KO macrophages with LPS (1 μg/mL) produced an increase in NFκB translocation (p65 subunit) to the nuclear compartment that was evident at 45 mins of incubation time. Figure 2A, 2B and 2C show that this translocation process was inhibited in MyD88-KO, TRIF-KO and Wild-type macrophages by pretreatment with triptolide in a dose dependent manner. Similarly, triptolide inhibited the gene expression of COX-2 and iNOS induced by LPS in MyD88-KO, TRIF-KO and Wild-type macrophages in a dose dependent manner (Figure 3A, 3B and 3C). Together, these results demonstrate that triptolide suppresses both MyD88 and TRIF -dependent signaling pathways.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6769-10-3/MediaObjects/12897_2009_Article_29_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Effect of triptolide on NFκB p65 nuclear translocation. Representative immunoblots of NFκB (p65). β-actin used as internal control. The protein expression was measured by densitometric analysis (Total Labs software v 2.01). The untreated control T- was normalized to a value of 100. Each value represents mean ± SD of three experiments performed in triplicate. A. Effect of triptolide on NFκB translocation in MyD88KO RAW macrophages B. Effect of triptolide on NFκB translocation in TRIFKO RAW macrophages C. Effect of triptolide on NFκB translocation in Wild-type RAW macrophages. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05) ANOVA followed by LSD

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6769-10-3/MediaObjects/12897_2009_Article_29_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Effect of triptolide on gene expression of COX-2 and iNOS (mean ± S.D). The expression of specific genes was measured by the mRNA quantity relative to the response to LPS activation (positive control) that was normalized to a value of 1.00; lower values represent greater inhibitory effects with 0.00 corresponding to a complete inhibition of the induced gene expression. The value of the negative control (no induction) was normalized to 0.00. A. Expression of COX-2 and iNOS genes in MyD88KO macrophages; B. Expression of COX-2 and iNOS genes in TRIFKO macrophages; C. Expression of COX-2 and iNOS genes in WT macrophages. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05) ANOVA followed by LSD.

Effect of triptolide activity on protein and mRNA expression of adaptor molecules and TLR

Triptolide was found to suppress both MyD88 and TRIF-dependent signaling pathways activated by LPS agonization of TLR4. (Figures 2, 3). Therefore, to further characterize the role of triptolide in the signaling events triggered by LPS in macrophages upstream of NFκB, we studied the expression of adapter molecules TRIF and MyD88 as well as that of TLR4 receptor at mRNA and protein levels. Triptolide treatment suppressed the mRNA and protein levels of LPS-induced TLR4 (Figure 5) and TRIF (Figure 4) expression but not MyD88 (data not shown). Suppression of poly I:C induced TLR3 mRNA expression by triptolide, the only TRIF specific toll-like receptor, has not been observed by qRT-PCR (data not shown). Together these observations suggest that triptolide inhibition of NFκB may be directed from the receptor level for MyD88 pathway and from the adapter level for TRIF pathway.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6769-10-3/MediaObjects/12897_2009_Article_29_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Effect of triptolide on mRNA and protein expression of TRIF (mean ± S.D). The mRNA expression of TRIF was measured by the mRNA quantity relative to the response to LPS activation (positive control) that was normalized to a value of 1.00; lower values represent greater inhibitory effects with 0.00 corresponding to a complete inhibition of the induced gene expression. The value of negative control (no induction) was normalized to 0.00. A. mRNA expression of TRIF; B. Protein expression of TRIF; C. Densitometric analysis for protein expression. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05) ANOVA followed by LSD.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6769-10-3/MediaObjects/12897_2009_Article_29_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Effect of triptolide on mRNA and protein expression of TLR 4 (mean ± S.D.). The mRNA expression of TLR 4 was measured by the mRNA quantity relative to the response to LPS activation (positive control) that was normalized to a value of 1.00; lower values represent greater inhibitory effects with 0.00 corresponding to a complete inhibition of the induced gene expression. The value of negative control (no induction) was normalized to 0.00. A. mRNA expression of TLR 4; B. Protein expression of TLR 4; C. Densitometric analysis for protein expression. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05) ANOVA followed by LSD

Discussion

Past studies have demonstrated that triptolide can induce anti-inflammatory responses in several assay systems [14, 23]. However, the direct molecular targets of triptolide have remained elusive. In our previous report, we showed that triptolide significantly inhibited the secretion of inflammatory cytokines that occurred with RAW 264.7 cells when stimulated with LPS [13]. Subsequently, we performed a gene array analysis (Tables 2, 3, 4) to elucidate additional members of the immune signaling cascade that could be potential targets of triptolide activity. The results of this analysis showed that 44 genes, which were known to regulate inflammation were differentially expressed in stimulated RAW 264.7 cells following triptolide treatment. These 44 genes represented key immune signaling pathways such as TLR signaling, MAPK signaling, Jak-STAT signaling and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. In our present study we undertook further investigation on cellular mechanism of triptolide activity that focused on TLRs, given their upstream location in the immune signaling cascade and their increasingly recognized importance in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [24].

LPS induces TLR4 dimerization to trigger the activation of downstream signaling pathways [25, 26]. This receptor dimerization activates transcription factor NFκB, leading to the induction of inflammatory gene products such as COX-2 and iNOS [25, 26]. Many studies have demonstrated that triptolide and its synthetic derivatives inhibited NFκB activation induced by TLR4 agonist LPS [13, 14, 27] but effect of triptolide on any TLR expression was never reported. The present study shows that triptolide suppressed ligand (LPS)-induced expression of TLR4 at mRNA and protein levels (Figure 5). We also observed for the first time that triptolide suppressed Poly(I:C) (TLR3 agonist) and Zymosan (TLR2 agonist) induced expression of COX-2 and iNOS (Figure 1A, B). These observations suggest that triptolide may offer protection against wide range of infections that occurs by different TLR inductions.

The TLR-ligand activities are transduced through specific intracellular adaptor molecules, most notably MyD88 and TRIF. The importance of MyD88 and TRIF lies in finding that each leads to a distinct profile of immune mediators that in turn determines the phenotype of the cells that primarily are responsible for the development of adaptive immune responses [14]. By studying the expression of well-characterized cytokine/chemokine target genes downstream of MyD88 (e.g., CCL3) and TRIF (e.g., IRG-1) [21, 22] we demonstrated differential regulation exerted by triptolide in ligand-induced 264.7 RAW macrophages. We observed that triptolide downregulated the expression of both MyD88-dependent cytokine such as CCL3 induced by MyD88-dependent ligands (Zymosan/TLR2 ligand, LPS/TLR4) and TRIF-dependent cytokine IRG-1 (Poly I:C/TLR3 and LPS/TLR4) in a concentration dependent manner (Figure 1A, 1B and 1C). To further confirm that both MyD88 and TRIF mediated signaling are involved in triptolide activity, we showed that triptolide suppressed the NFκB translocation (p65 molecule) to the nucleus and also the downstream expression of COX-2 and iNOS mRNA in MyD88 KO (when only TRIF is present) and TRIF-KO (when only MyD88 is present) macrophages as well as in wild-type macrophages induced with TLR specific ligand, LPS (Figure 2 and 3). These results show that inhibition of NFκB activation and COX-2 and iNOS expression by triptolide could be achieved in presence of MyD88 or TRIF alone or when both are present as in wild type macrophages. These results also suggest that triptolide can block both MyD88- and TRIF-dependent pathways that lead to NFκB transactivation. Since MyD88 and TRIF are the only adapters exclusively mediating all TLR signaling, it is possible that triptolide may suppress wide-range of TLR signaling through other TLRs in addition to TLR4. Although in the current study we focused on TLR4 pathway, our gene array data (Tables 2a and 3a) as well as the observations presented in Figure 1A and 1B may support the suggestion that triptolide has activities against other TLRs. When the changes in the expression of TRIF and MyD88 in response to triptolide were tested (Figure 4), triptolide inhibited the mRNA and protein expression of TRIF, but not MyD88 in a dose dependent manner. A study by Yamamoto et al. (2003) [28] using TRIF knockout mice has revealed that TRIF is physiologically essential for TLR-3 mediated signaling and that TRIF is involved in the LPS-induced MyD88-independent pathway.

Triptolide blocked early signaling pathways of TLRs suggesting that its inhibitory action was at the receptor and adapter molecule levels. Thus, a direct interaction of triptolide with TLR4 may be hypothesized. This study suggests that plant compounds, such as triptolide, can modulate TLR-mediated inflammatory responses and can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, associated with exaggerated TLR activation. Macrophages are the key antigen presenting cells in the pathogenesis of RA and involvement of TLR4 has been shown to play role in joint destruction in RA [29]. Therefore, the present study showing interaction of triptolide with components of TLR signaling, such as TLR4, are particularly relevant and support the recent promise shown in clinics against RA by botanical extracts containing triptolide [30, 31].

Conclusions

The results from the present study suggest that the suppression of agonist-induced NFκB activation and chemokine expression by triptolide is mediated by targeting the early signaling of TLRs, particularly that of TLR4 in RAW 264.7 cells. Triptolide downregulated the expression of TLR4 proteins and that of TRIF adapter proteins in the MyD88-independent pathway of TLR4. In addition gene expression profiles in response to triptolide treatment in stimulated macrophages suggest that triptolide may have multiple cellular targets contributing to its strong anti-inflammatory and immune suppressive properties.

Author information

MD, VGP and IR have a Ph.D in Biology or related fields as their highest obtained degree. RD has a M.S. in Horticulture and is currently studying towards her MBA. MD was formerly an Assistant Research Professor at the Biotechnology Center at Rutgers University, NJ and currently an Associate Professor in the Nutrigenomics Program, South Dakota state University, SD. MD specializes in Molecular Biology. VGP was formerly a Postdoctoral Associate at Rutgers University and is currently working as a Postdoctoral Researcher at University of Cincinnati, OH. RD is a Senior Laboratory Technician in IR's group at Rutgers University, NJ. IR is a Professor in the Department of Plant Biology and Pathology at Rutgers University, NJ.

Notes

Abbreviations

COX-2: 

Cycloxygenase-2

iNOS: 

inducible Nitric oxide synthase

IRG: 

Interferon regulating gene

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharide

MyD88: 

Myeloid differentiation 88

NFκB: 

Nuclear factor kappa B

Poly I: 

C: polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid

TLRs: 

Toll like Receptors

TRIF: 

TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β

CCL3: 

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Reneta Pouleva for her excellent technical support.

Funding for this work came from Phytomedics, Inc., Jamesburg, NJ to IR and by National Institute of Health (NIH) Pathway to Independence award [Grant K99AT004245 and 4R00AT004245] to MD. Additional funding sources are (to IR): NIH Center for Dietary Supplements Research on Botanicals and Metabolic Syndrome [Grant 1-P50 AT002776-01], NIH [Grant U01 TW006674] for ICBG. VGP and RD were supported in part or in full by the grants listed above.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cancer and Cell Biology Department, University of Cincinnati
(2)
Nutrigenomics Program, South Dakota State University
(3)
Biotech Center, Rutgers University

References

  1. Cook DN, Pisetsky DS, Schwartz DA: Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of human disease. Nat Immunol. 2004, 5: 975-979. 10.1038/ni1116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Michelsen KS, Wong MH, Shah PK, Zhang W, Yano J, Doherty TM, Akira S, Rajavashisth TB, Arditi M: Lack of Toll-like receptor 4 or myeloid differentiation factor 88 reduces atherosclerosis and alters plaque phenotype in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 10679-10684. 10.1073/pnas.0403249101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorkbacka H, Kunjathoor VV, Moore KJ, Koehn S, Ordija CM, Lee MA, Means T, Halmen K, Luster AD, Golenbock DT, Freeman MW: Reduced atherosclerosis in MyD88-null mice links elevated serum cholesterol levels to activation of innate immunity signaling pathways. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 416-421. 10.1038/nm1008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Takeda K, Akira S: Toll-like receptors. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2007, Chapter 14 (Unit 14): 12-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Foster SL, Hargreaves DC, Medzhitov R: Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature. 2007, 447: 972-978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. O'Neill LA: Targeting signal transduction as a strategy to treat inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5: 549-563. 10.1038/nrd2070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pandey S, Agrawal DK: Immunobiology of Toll-like receptors: emerging trends. Immunol Cell Biol. 2006, 84: 333-341. 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2006.01444.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Amati L, Pepe M, Passeri ME, Mastronardi ML, Jirillo E, Covelli V: Toll-like receptor signaling mechanisms involved in dendritic cell activation: potential therapeutic control of T cell polarization. Curr Pharm Des. 2006, 12: 4247-4254. 10.2174/138161206778743583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabbagh K, Lewis DB: Toll-like receptors and T-helper-1/T-helper-2 responses. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003, 16: 199-204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parker LC, Prince LR, Sabroe I: Translational mini-review series on Toll-like receptors: networks regulated by Toll-like receptors mediate innate and adaptive immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007, 147: 199-207. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03203.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujihara M, Muroi M, Tanamoto K, Suzuki T, Azuma H, Ikeda H: Molecular mechanisms of macrophage activation and deactivation by lipopolysaccharide: roles of the receptor complex. Pharmacol Ther. 2003, 100: 171-194. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2003.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lipsky PE, Tao XL: A potential new treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: thunder god vine. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 26: 713-723. 10.1016/S0049-0172(97)80040-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ma J, Dey M, Yang H, Poulev A, Pouleva R, Dorn R, Lipsky PE, Kennelly EJ, Raskin I: Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive compounds from Tripterygium wilfordii. Phytochemistry. 2007, 68: 1172-1178. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.02.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gong Y, Xue B, Jiao J, Jing L, Wang X: Triptolide inhibits COX-2 expression and PGE2 release by suppressing the activity of NF-kappaB and JNK in LPS-treated microglia. J Neurochem. 2008, 107: 779-788. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05653.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Karin M, Yamamoto Y, Wang QM: The IKK NF- kappa B system: a treasure trove for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004, 3: 17-26. 10.1038/nrd1279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang WT, Kang JJ, Lee KY, Wei K, Anderson E, Gotmare S, Ross JA, Rosen GD: Triptolide and chemotherapy cooperate in tumor cell apoptosis. A role for the p53 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 2221-2217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Toubi E, Shoenfeld Y: Toll-like receptors and their role in the development of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity. 2004, 37: 183-188. 10.1080/08916930410001704944.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dey M, Ribnicky D, Kurmukov AG, Raskin I: In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of a seed preparation containing phenethylisothiocyanate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006, 317: 326-333. 10.1124/jpet.105.096511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang H, Park CK, Ryu JY, Chang EJ, Lee Y, Kang SS, Kim HH: Expression profiling of lipopolysaccharide target genes in RAW264.7 cells by oligonucleotide microarray analyses. Arch Pharmacol Res. 2006, 29: 890-897. 10.1007/BF02973911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Krakauer T: Molecular therapeutic targets in inflammation: cyclooxygenase and NF-kappaB. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2004, 3: 317-324. 10.2174/1568010043343714.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fujihara M, Muroi M, Tanamoto K, Suzuki T, Azuma H, Ikeda H: Molecular mechanisms of macrophage activation and deactivation by lipopolysaccharide: roles of the receptor complex. Pharmacol Ther. 2003, 100: 171-194. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2003.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T: Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nature Immunology. 2001, 2: 675-680. 10.1038/90609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiao J, Xue B, Zhang L, Gong Y, Li K, Wang H, Jing L, Xie J, Wang X: Triptolide inhibits amyloid-beta1-42-induced TNF-alpha and IL-1beta production in cultured rat microglia. J Neuroimmunol. 2008, 205: 32-36. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kawai T, Takeuchi O, Fujita T, Inoue J-i, Mühlradt FP, Sato S, Hoshino K, Akira S: Lipopolysaccharide Stimulates the MyD88-Independent Pathway and Results in Activation of IFN-Regulatory Factor 3 and the Expression of a Subset of Lipopolysaccharide-Inducible Genes. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 5887-5894.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pindado J, Balsinde J, Balboa MA: TLR3-Dependent Induction of Nitric Oxide Synthase in RAW 264.7 Macrophage-Like Cells via a Cytosolic Phospholipase A2/Cyclooxygenase-2 Pathway. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 4821-4828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Youn HS, Lim HJ, Lee HJ, Hwang D, Yang M, Jeon R, Ryu JH: Garlic (Allium sativum) extract inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced Toll-like receptor 4 dimerization. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008, 72: 368-375. 10.1271/bbb.70434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu Q, Chen T, Chen G, Li N, Wang J, Ma P: Immunosuppressant triptolide inhibits dendritic cell-mediated chemoattraction of neutrophils and T cells through inhibiting Stat3 phosphorylation and NF-kappaB activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 345: 1122-1130. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, Sanjo H, Takeuchi O, Sugiyama M, Okabe M, Takeda K, Akira S: Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science. 2003, 301: 640-643. 10.1126/science.1087262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang Q, Ma Y, Adebayo A, Pope RM: Increased macrophage activation mediated through toll-like receptors in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56: 2192-2201. 10.1002/art.22707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt BM, Ribnicky DM, Lipsky PE, Raskin I: Revisiting the ancient concept of botanical therapeutics. Nat Chem Biol. 2007, 3: 360-366. 10.1038/nchembio0707-360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldbach R, Wilson M, Fleischmann R, Olsen N, Silverfield J, Kempf P, Kivitz A, Sherrer Y, Pucino F, Csako G, Costello R, Pham TH, Snyder C, Heijde van der D, Tao X, Wesley R, Lipsky PE: Comparison of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F versus sulfasalazine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151: 229-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Premkumar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.